Donalbain, however, does next to nothing in the entire play. As Duncan's younger son, he is not Duncan's heir and so is already less important than Malcolm. In the entire play, he only speaks in act two, scene three, in which Duncan's corpse is discovered. He says, "To Ireland I. Our separated fortune shall keep us both the safer. Where we are, there's daggers in men's smiles. The near in blood, the nearer bloody," (2.3.163-166) to Malcolm after Malcolm has told Donalbain that he plans on going to England. Donalbain says that they should split up and flee to avoid getting killed. He then presumably flees to Ireland. However, he could also go to England, stay in Scotland, commit suicide, or practice breakdancing. There is no way of knowing what he actually does, because he simply disappears after act two, scene three. He never appears again in the play after this scene, and is rarely mentioned. Those few times when he is mentioned give no information as to what he is doing or where he is. Unlike Malcolm, he does not raise an army, overthrow Macbeth, become king, or do anything.
Why does Shakespeare include Donalbain? The play already has quite a few characters who actually do things, yet the few lines Donalbain has could be either cut or changed to Malcolm's lines. It seems that including Donalbain in the play serves no purpose other than giving readers/people watching the play another character to try to keep track of. Does Donalbain have some symbolic role in the play? If so, what? It seems it would be hard for a character to have any meaningful symbolic value when he has about three lines. Is his character relevant? Could he and should he have been cut from the play? I say he has no symbolic value and could and should have been cut.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.